B.Mulligan wrote:The monster 88s should work well. Take a look at the enforcers 93/100 too.
B.Mulligan wrote:Take a look at the enforcers 93/100 too.
Max_501 wrote:B.Mulligan wrote:Take a look at the enforcers 93/100 too.
What makes you feel this ski is a good fit for PMTS skiers?
lakespapa wrote:Max_501 wrote:B.Mulligan wrote:Take a look at the enforcers 93/100 too.
What makes you feel this ski is a good fit for PMTS skiers?
They're pretty directional. Lay them over, and they carve.
ToddW wrote:lakespapa wrote:Max_501 wrote:
They're pretty directional. Lay them over, and they carve.
I have no idea what your first sentence means. Directional ski?
As you probably know, there used to be a great many posts on EpicSki boasting of how brilliantly one random fat ski or another carved. The claim was even made for some reverse camber skis.
Can you instead explain how the ski rewards good skiing movements and how it speaks up to warn you if you push the tails out or rotate your feet or incline/lean in or camp out a foot behind the bindings? How does it respond to fore-aft input. Does the flex pattern aid or hinder your efforts to progressively tighten your turn radius up until release.
I'm not judging this particular ski since I've never been on it. I'm just suggesting what would catch my attention in a gear section post as a PMTS skier.
B.Mulligan wrote:Skied a 180 J Skis Masreblaster the other day...I liked it in warm chunky snow of New England
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests