ErikCO wrote:As to Harald's reviews on skis, that is disappointing. Why do the ski companies insist on changing all their skis up every few years? They should keep a few models that are essentially unchanged for a good number of years and only "update" them very carefully.
h.harb wrote:Great posts by Helluva and 501. Hate to say it but today I skied many different skis at the on-snow ski show. Stockli skis win. Heads skis suck. Even the race Head Sl skis felt terrible.
jbotti wrote:Moved from PMTS section
jbotti wrote:Of Rockered Skis in the Rocker 3.0 category (plenty of tip and tail Rocker but less than what Rossi has done for years with their super rockered skis) the Head Kores are the best of the bunch IMO. I have skied the 93 and the 99. Everyone who has skied the 105 has loved it. I am supposed to go heli skiing next Thursday and the skis they have for me are Head Kore 105s. I can let you know after I ski them assuming weather permits.
You can read this which I posted on the Kore 93 a while back:
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=5252
h.harb wrote:I found a number of good skis at Stockli. We will bring in some Stockli skis to the shop. We will research the carving skis from Blossom as well. They were not in the show but we can get them in Europe from the factory. The Heads, Fischer, were very disappointing. Some of the wide skis that people rave about are junk. The Rip Stick and Volkl equivalent are really bad skis if you want a solid product under your feet. I am keeping my present Head skis, which are so much better than next year's product.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests